Feminist Critique of Rawl's Theory Of Justice

 Feminist Critique of Rawl's Theory Of Justice

John Rawl's theory of justice, as presented in his book, ''A Theory of Justice'' has been subject to feminist critique, which argues that it fails to take account the experiences and perspective of women and other marginalized groups.

One of the main criticism of Rawl's theory is that it assumes a gender-neutral society , where individuals are free and equal to pursue their own interest.However, feminist argue that gender is a pervasive and central feature of society, which shapes our experiences, opportunities and expectations. Therefore, Rawl's theory does not adequately account for the ways in which gender inequality affects the distribution of resources and opportunities.

Martha Nussabum, in her book, "Sex and Social Justice'', argues that Rawl's theory neglects the role of emotions and relationship in shaping our experiences of justice. Nussabum contends that the traditional liberal focus on rationality and autonomy ignores the importance of care, compassion and empathy, which are typically associated with femininity. As a result, Rawl's theory fails to acknowledge the ways in which women's experiences of injustice are often rooted in their roles as caregivers and nurturers.

Another notable scholar, Susan Moller Okin , in her book, "Justice, Gender and the Family'', criticizes Rawl's theory for its neglect of the family and its role in reproducing gender inequality. Okin argues that Rawl's focus on individual rights and responsibilities overlooks the ways in which family structures and norms can limit women's opportunities and perpetuate gendered expectations. Moreover, Rawl's theory assumes that individuals have equal access to the resources and opportunities necessary to pursue their own interest, but this assumption is problematic in a society where women are disproportionately burdened with caring for children and other family members.

While, another feminist scholar, Iris Young in her book, "Justice and the Politics of difference'', critiques Rawl's theory for its failure to address the experiences of marginalized groups, such as women, people of color and LGBTQAI+ individuals. She argues that Rawl's emphasis on individual rights and the fair distribution of resources ignores the ways in which systematic discrimination and social norms can limit access to resources and opportunities for these groups.

In conclusion, feminist critiques of Rawl's Theory of Justice challenges its assumptions of a gender-neutral society and its neglect of the experiences and perspectives of marginalized groups These critiques highlight the importance of considering the role of emotions, relationships and family structures in shaping our experiences of Justice, as well as the ways in which systematic discrimination and social norms can limit access to resources and opportunities.